Saturday, January 01, 2005

 

Distractive 911 Arguments

The contention that the Bush administration knew about and could have prevented the attacks on 9/11/2001 only seems to be overshadowing the argument that Bush and Co. were very much a part of the orchestration of 911. It has never even been proven by our highest law enforcement agency, the FBI, that there were even terrorists on board the hijacked planes.

As the media, politicians and the public remain mired in the "Bush knew" argument, the far more damaging aspects of 911(to this government) remain blocked from public consideration. It's time to go for the truth juggler of 911 and let the chips fall where they may. If the Bush administration is innocent of 911 complicity then let it release ALL the evidence relating to 911. If Arab terrorists hijacked the planes then release ALL of the information to prove it.

Any blockage of investigation and/or information can only lead me to conclude that conspirators are being protected. I wouldn't hold my breath, though, waiting for disclosure to occur. It has been 40 years since President Kennedy was gunned down in Dallas, and the official version remains that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin, despite just about all the evidence pointing elsewhere. The American public is so sadly misinformed about the world and US history that a critical mass demanding government disclosure seems to be in the ranks of the impossible!


Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?